Since decades, the politics of many countries, especially the U.S., has been a tug-of-war between two opposing camps. One believes that we should be more generous with people in need, while the other believes that taxes and regulations which create this generosity are stifling the growth that depends on that generosity.
Would it be possible for these two groups to work together? What if raising social benefits such as income, housing, and health care could actually be beneficial? Accelerate Yourself What is our economy’s growth rate?
We can encourage more people to be involved in society and the economy by investing in programs which reduce fear of economics. They will invent, take care, help, and prosper. Safety nets become trampolines.
The newly released book contains new information that confirms this. You are GuaranteedNatalie Foster, policy advocate. Over the last few years, the U.S. has embarked on a sweeping set of new programs and experiments–everything from a child tax credit during Covid to cities trying to provide their least fortunate with a guaranteed income to states expanding Medicaid.
The anger of the working class led to the creation of these programs, which raised the bar for the people, especially in the areas of family care, education and housing. They also modeled the way other Western nations operate. Many people believe that they can never provide a decent lifestyle for their family and themselves, even when they follow the social rules. This is a crisis in the system.
The working class is growing, and this includes more college educated young people. Fears of workers being robbed by artificial intelligence are felt across all socioeconomic groups, including delivery drivers, Hollywood writers and lawyers. Strikes and unionization are taking place in all industries.
Despite this, many companies continue to prosper (both in terms of profits and stock values). The American economy seems to have a low gear. The number of new businesses in the U.S. is down by almost 50% from the 1970s. Research also suggests a significant slowdown in scientific advancement in recent decades. Geographically, more people are stuck in their birthplaces, and this can limit economic opportunities.
If the problem is too few people actually contribute to our economy because of the system that holds them back, then what?
Precarity, a complicated term for fearful people, prevents them from taking part in the economy. You’re less likely to invent a cure for disease if you are worried about your housing. You’re more likely to put off investing in your future if you can’t find childcare. This could be because you don’t have the time to learn a new skill, look for a job that pays better, or start a small business. You miss work if you are sick. You may not buy the products or services which employ other people if you lack money. Your anger at the current system is more likely to turn violent and destructive.
Enabling Innovation
Imagine what people would do differently in an economy where society provided for their basic needs. You are Guaranteed book describes.
When everyone has the basics in place, then some people will be able to contribute something extraordinary. The next Einstein or Marie Curie would be more accessible to everyone. According to one study, we’d have four times more innovators if all people had the social economic background necessary for innovation. Imagine how many “Lost Einsteins” there would be.
When I invest in tech startups (my occupation), people are often amazed at how the second venture of a founder, partly boosted by their own economic security, can outshine the first. Take a look at Reed Hastings second act. Netflix. Or Evan Williams second act. Twitter. The founder of an accelerator for Silicon Valley startups told me the best founders are from wealthy families. They can go without income while they raise money.
Think of the many lost Lin-Manuel Mirandas and Octavias Butlers and Maya Lins whose artistic gifts are choked by economic necessity. We can empower a whole new generation of creators and innovators by providing economic stability.
People would be more willing to invest in education, skills and a career if they felt safe. Stockton residents who were offered $500 per month as a guarantee of income in an experiment found that they felt more secure. More information about the product You are likely to be able to get a full-time job.
A higher social floor
The ability to accept risks comes from the feeling of safety, and not from fear (as is often believed). We need people to have the confidence to adjust to a world where technology is advancing at an unpredictable rate.
People who feel underpaid sometimes strike. This can lead to a loss of revenue for companies and a risk in services. The cost of poverty to the U.S. economy is estimated at one trillion dollars per year. This includes lost wages, medical costs, criminal activity, etc.
The opponents of guaranteeing things often use classist and racist arguments, claiming that the poor “cannot be trusted”. To some degree, debates over guaranteed items will revolve around your understanding of human nature. If you give away free stuff, what are they going to do with it? People want to contribute. We all strive for purpose, contribution, and creativity. All of us want to be needed and to make a difference in this short life we have. Ironically, many people who advocate for freedom of choice seem to think that if given the freedom they will freeload on others (especially poor ones).
These guarantees will come at a price. It is a question of whether the cost will justify itself. Commentators often present a higher level of social protection as a compromise: by providing guarantees we will slow down the economy, because taxation would reduce people’s incentive to innovate. The incentives to invent are high enough for those who have the greatest privileges. More people need to get involved than we do a greater incentive for rich investors to earn more. (This is my occupation). We might use the AI anxiety as a justification to act now. With a divided U.S. Congress nearing paralysis, it may be that only policies that boost both growth and help those who are in need can get through.
We can see that the guarantee is described as follows: You are Guaranteed As a “safety net,” we will forever be worried about people becoming entangled in the net, never to emerge. These benefits can be seen as a “floor” that lifts people. The best way to design a socially higher floor is as a trampoline. This will allow people to be bouncing up into dignity, inventing and caring for our society.
![](https://fortune.com/img-assets/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/hte-guarantee-book-cover-e1713821514747.jpg?w=1440&q=75)
Roy Bahat The head of a venture capital firm Bloomberg BetaThe chairperson of the Aspen Institute Business Roundtable: Organized Labor.
The latest must-read articles published by Fortune:
- The Gen Zers, millennials and Gen Zers are Switching jobs is increasing in speedIt’s working. This is where things can go wrong.
- Rihanna’s ‘Fenty Effect’ could teach AI developers Fighting bias and promoting inclusivity
- The betting industry thought it had a winning partnership with sports leagues, but gambling scandals have been uncovered. Turning Americans against each other
- The Second Chance Month has failed to deliver on its promise. Here’s How to fix it
These opinions are the sole opinions of the authors, and not necessarily the beliefs and opinions of Fortune.com. Fortune.
CFO Daily is a free newsletter that keeps you informed about the latest trends and issues in corporate finance. Sign up Free.